Core i3-6100T vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 10.1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 10.1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a20f12
Core
Skylake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
16/32
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
November 2015
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
1060.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
19.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
25.26k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
10.77k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
23.59k (x6.8)
TOTAL
43.92k
79.51k (x1.81)
Multithread
i3-6100T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
349.53k (x7.43)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
470.67k (x10.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
207.28k (x20.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
33.13k (x8.6)
TOTAL
105.21k
1060.62k (x10.08)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
10101 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4