Core i3-6100T vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.4 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a50f00
Core
Skylake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2015
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
14.34k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
17.67k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
6.41k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
14.95k (x4.31)
TOTAL
43.92k
53.37k (x1.22)
Multithread
i3-6100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
83.58k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
119.22k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
48.56k (x4.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.83k (x0.99)
TOTAL
105.21k
255.19k (x2.43)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4