| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs Core 2 Duo E8400


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 91.1 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 3.4 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
1067a
Core
Skylake-S
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
27.11k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3.81k
2.47k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
6.74k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
2.87k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
4.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
28.89k
16.55k (x0.57)

Multithread

i3-6100

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.75k
4.64k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
37.33k
12.36k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.13k
4.86k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
1.96k (x0.55)
TOTAL
60.77k
23.82k (x0.39)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
3.3k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
7.28k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.44k
2.88k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.83k (x0.87)
TOTAL
43.55k
17.28k (x0.4)

Multithread

i3-6100

E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
28.99k
6.3k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
45.75k
13.71k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.72k
5.32k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
1.78k (x0.48)
TOTAL
91.14k
27.11k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i3-6100
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
568 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
897 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1787 points/W
417 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5393 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1469 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
11770 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4