| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 11.1 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
50657
Core
Skylake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/2
18/36
TDP
51 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
September 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.81k
4.52k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
17.94k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
5.5k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
9.64k (x2.25)
TOTAL
28.89k
37.6k (x1.3)

Multithread

i3-6100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
7.75k
84.93k (x10.96)
Test#2 (FP)
37.33k
409.55k (x10.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.13k
122.88k (x10.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
22.12k (x6.21)
TOTAL
60.77k
639.48k (x10.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
16.03k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
23.95k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.44k
6.03k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
9.37k (x2.13)
TOTAL
43.55k
55.38k (x1.27)

Multithread

i3-6100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
28.99k
316.11k (x10.91)
Test#2 (FP)
45.75k
503.75k (x11.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.72k
131.82k (x10.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
22.24k (x6.05)
TOTAL
91.14k
973.92k (x10.69)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.78k
16.4k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
20.97k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
5.82k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
8.86k (x2.37)
TOTAL
43.92k
52.05k (x1.19)

Multithread

i3-6100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
29.02k
316.84k (x10.92)
Test#2 (FP)
49.55k
461.09k (x9.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.3k
129.82k (x10.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
22.09k (x6.74)
TOTAL
94.15k
929.85k (x9.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
29.53k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
22.59k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
5.99k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
10.22k (x2.55)
TOTAL
52.84k
68.33k (x1.29)

Multithread

i3-6100

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
587.06k (x11.73)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
496.41k (x10.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
134.66k (x11.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
22.99k (x6.19)
TOTAL
112.28k
1241.12k (x11.05)

Performance/W
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4