| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 91.1 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
100fa0
Core
Skylake-S
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
51 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.81k
1.98k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
4.57k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.14k
2.57k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
3.51k (x0.82)
TOTAL
28.89k
12.64k (x0.44)

Multithread

i3-6100

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.75k
11.86k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
37.33k
27.4k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.13k
15.39k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.56k
3.46k (x0.97)
TOTAL
60.77k
58.11k (x0.96)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
5.17k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
5.33k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.44k
2.76k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.51k (x0.8)
TOTAL
43.55k
16.77k (x0.39)

Multithread

i3-6100

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.99k
29.82k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
45.75k
30.79k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.72k
15.88k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
3.69k (x1)
TOTAL
91.14k
80.19k (x0.88)

Performance/W
i3-6100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
568 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
897 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1787 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3719 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5393 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1469 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
11770 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4