Core i3-6100 vs i7-11700F
Description
The i3-6100 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 4.6 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100 gets a score of 112.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 4.6 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0671
Core
Skylake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.84k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.28k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.89k
32.55k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
21.04k
26.95k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.9k
10.76k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
19.32k (x4.82)
TOTAL
52.84k
89.58k (x1.7)
Multithread
i3-6100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.05k
232.06k (x4.64)
Test#2 (FP)
47.13k
203.56k (x4.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.38k
72.89k (x6.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
3.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
112.28k
512.32k (x4.56)
Performance/W
i3-6100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
981 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
924 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
2202 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6187 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5686 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1325 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
14282 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4