| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i7-3770


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 2.7 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2016
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
133.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
12.55k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
12.11k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
4.69k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
5.25k (x1.71)
TOTAL
24.53k
34.59k (x1.41)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
49.56k (x3.23)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
56.21k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
22.17k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
5.75k (x2.22)
TOTAL
49.87k
133.7k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
1022 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1707 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
1736 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3670 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5683 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1540 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12265 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4