Core i3-6006U vs i5-2540M
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2540M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1 times faster than the i5-2540M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1 times faster than the i5-2540M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1023, rPGA 988B
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
21.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
48.62k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
7.8k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
7.03k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
3.36k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
2.93k (x0.95)
TOTAL
24.53k
21.12k (x0.86)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
18.55k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
17.42k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
8.43k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
4.22k (x1.64)
TOTAL
49.87k
48.62k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
1022 points/W
530 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1707 points/W
498 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
1389 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
3670 points/GHz
2364 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5683 points/GHz
2132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1540 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
12265 points/GHz
6400 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4