Core i3-6006U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.5 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2016
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
4k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
14.19k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
4.62k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
11.03k (x2.81)
TOTAL
16.77k
33.84k (x2.02)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
22.77k (x5.95)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
96.59k (x5.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
31.65k (x5.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
2.45k (x0.68)
TOTAL
30.39k
153.46k (x5.05)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
12.61k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
17.94k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.83k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
10.81k (x3.75)
TOTAL
23.48k
46.19k (x1.97)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
74.62k (x4.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
119.63k (x5.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
32.65k (x5.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.52k (x1.03)
TOTAL
47.46k
229.42k (x4.83)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
12.5k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
19.05k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
4.72k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
10.3k (x3.34)
TOTAL
24.53k
46.57k (x1.9)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
74.58k (x4.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
126.96k (x4.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
31.76k (x5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
2.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
49.87k
235.8k (x4.73)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
22k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
19.98k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
4.57k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
11.31k (x3.07)
TOTAL
30.66k
57.85k (x1.89)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
136.69k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
135.25k (x4.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
32.76k (x4.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
2.48k (x0.61)
TOTAL
67.91k
307.18k (x4.52)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4