| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2016
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
4.05k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
15.29k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
9.04k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
10.54k (x2.69)
TOTAL
16.77k
38.92k (x2.32)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
9.05k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
33.88k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
15.34k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
6.74k (x1.86)
TOTAL
30.39k
65.01k (x2.14)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
7.07k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
10.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.27k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
5.66k (x1.97)
TOTAL
23.48k
28.56k (x1.22)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
25.28k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
37.48k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
17.77k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
6.92k (x2.84)
TOTAL
47.46k
87.45k (x1.84)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
13.9k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
20.13k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
9.41k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
10.59k (x3.44)
TOTAL
24.53k
54.03k (x2.2)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
55.4k (x3.62)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
59.01k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
22.83k (x3.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
6.7k (x2.59)
TOTAL
49.87k
143.94k (x2.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
25.53k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
19.99k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
9.31k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
10.81k (x2.93)
TOTAL
30.66k
65.64k (x2.14)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
58.46k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
57.31k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
20.1k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
6.81k (x1.68)
TOTAL
67.91k
142.69k (x2.1)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4