Core i3-6006U vs i3-4150
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-4150 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2016
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
40.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
20.5k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
11.78k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
4.52k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
3.48k (x0.94)
TOTAL
30.66k
40.27k (x1.31)
Multithread
i3-6006U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
26.29k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
19.27k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
7.03k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
2.42k (x0.6)
TOTAL
67.91k
55k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
487 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
1019 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
5856 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
11505 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4