Core i3-6006U vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.9 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.9 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
860f01
Core
Skylake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
15.48k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
22.82k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
8.63k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
7.17k (x1.95)
TOTAL
30.66k
54.11k (x1.76)
Multithread
i3-6006U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
117.98k (x3.99)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
146.43k (x5.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
65.54k (x9.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
4.77k (x1.18)
TOTAL
67.91k
334.72k (x4.93)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4