Core i3-6006U vs FX 6100
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 49.9 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
600f12
Core
Skylake-U
Zambezi
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2016
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
65.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
7.15k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
6.53k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
2.55k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
4.2k (x1.36)
TOTAL
24.53k
20.42k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-6006U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
24.5k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
23.85k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
13.45k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
3.51k (x1.36)
TOTAL
49.87k
65.32k (x1.31)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1022 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1707 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
688 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3670 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5683 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1540 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
12265 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4