Core i3-6006U vs A6 3600
Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 47.5 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
300f10
Core
Skylake-U
Llano
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2016
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
4.03k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
4.25k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.19k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
1.54k (x0.53)
TOTAL
23.48k
12.01k (x0.51)
Multithread
i3-6006U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
15.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
16.66k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
8.33k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
3.48k (x1.43)
TOTAL
47.46k
44.12k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i3-6006U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
998 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1579 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
425 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
3164 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3640 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
11739 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4