| | | | | | |

Core i3-6006U vs i5-12400F


Description
The i3-6006U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6006U gets a score of 67.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 5.9 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
90675
Core
Skylake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
18432 kB
Date
November 2016
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
30.66k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.91k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2.02k
7.43k (x3.68)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
18.64k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.63k
13.15k (x5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
14.82k (x3.78)
TOTAL
16.77k
54.04k (x3.22)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.83k
36.23k (x9.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.17k
134.76k (x7.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.77k
84.06k (x14.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.62k
16.71k (x4.62)
TOTAL
30.39k
271.76k (x8.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
24.18k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
10.51k
23.85k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
14.42k (x5.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.88k
14.87k (x5.16)
TOTAL
23.48k
77.32k (x3.29)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.98k
122.98k (x8.21)
Test#2 (FP)
23.68k
168.77k (x7.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
96.11k (x15.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
16.32k (x6.7)
TOTAL
47.46k
404.19k (x8.52)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.34k
24.24k (x3.3)
Test#2 (FP)
11.37k
24.74k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.74k
13.95k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.08k
14.47k (x4.7)
TOTAL
24.53k
77.41k (x3.16)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
126.87k (x8.28)
Test#2 (FP)
25.61k
186.48k (x7.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
92.37k (x14.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
15.45k (x5.98)
TOTAL
49.87k
421.18k (x8.45)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.6k
33.85k (x2.69)
Test#2 (FP)
11.66k
20.33k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.71k
10.51k (x3.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
11.77k (x3.2)
TOTAL
30.66k
76.46k (x2.49)

Multithread

i3-6006U

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.56k
174.21k (x5.89)
Test#2 (FP)
27.74k
141.31k (x5.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
64.86k (x9.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.06k
19.01k (x4.69)
TOTAL
67.91k
399.39k (x5.88)

Performance/W
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1971 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1849 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
437 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
270 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
4528 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6006U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6302 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1355 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1842 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
15330 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4