Core i3-5005U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.9 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.9 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
50657
Core
Broadwell-U
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-5005U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
12.92k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
10.97k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.51k
2.54k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
5.09k (x2.02)
TOTAL
25.61k
31.52k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-5005U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
103.33k (x4.47)
Test#2 (FP)
22.79k
87.67k (x3.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
20.1k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.91k (x1.62)
TOTAL
54.99k
216.02k (x3.93)
Performance/W
i3-5005U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1541 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1519 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5541 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4749 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
12804 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4