| | | | | | |

Core i3-5005U vs Ryzen 5 2400G


Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.6 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f10
Core
Broadwell-U
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-5005U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6.24k
13.04k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
8.82k
22.35k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.38k
5.37k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.4k
3.4k (x1.41)
TOTAL
19.84k
44.15k (x2.23)

Multithread

i3-5005U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
12.33k
56.49k (x4.58)
Test#2 (FP)
25.82k
100.74k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.56k
28.21k (x4.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.04k (x0.95)
TOTAL
47.89k
188.49k (x3.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-5005U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
14.2k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
23.23k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.51k
5.35k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
5.18k (x2.06)
TOTAL
25.61k
47.96k (x1.87)

Multithread

i3-5005U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
58.24k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.79k
105.72k (x4.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
28.73k (x4.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
5.59k (x1.85)
TOTAL
54.99k
198.27k (x3.61)

Performance/W
i3-5005U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1541 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1519 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5541 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4749 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12804 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4