Core i3-5005U vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i3-5005U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.7 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-5005U gets a score of 55 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.7 times faster than the i3-5005U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f81
Core
Broadwell-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
25.61k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.99k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-5005U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.08k
13.02k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
9.5k
20.56k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.51k
4.81k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
5.43k (x2.16)
TOTAL
25.61k
43.82k (x1.71)
Multithread
i3-5005U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
27.29k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
22.79k
49.37k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
13.57k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
5.61k (x1.85)
TOTAL
54.99k
95.84k (x1.74)
Performance/W
i3-5005U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1541 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1519 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
202 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
3666 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-5005U
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5541 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4749 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1255 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
12804 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4