| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs Xeon W3550


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 66.7 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
106a5
Core
Haswell
Bloomfield
Architecture
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
54 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2015
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
2.3k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
5.21k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
3.31k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
3.09k (x0.74)
TOTAL
23.88k
13.92k (x0.58)

Multithread

i3-4170

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
8.75k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
19.8k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
12.38k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
6.17k (x2.3)
TOTAL
49k
47.09k (x0.96)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4170
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
8.34k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
5.56k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
3.26k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
3.08k (x0.74)
TOTAL
34.04k
20.24k (x0.59)

Multithread

i3-4170

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
32.5k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
21.59k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
12.85k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
6.27k (x1.62)
TOTAL
66.65k
73.21k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i3-4170
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
478 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
463 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1234 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3157 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1369 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1132 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
9199 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4