Core i3-4170 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
13.02k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
20.56k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
4.81k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
5.43k (x1.24)
TOTAL
44.24k
43.82k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-4170
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
27.29k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
49.37k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
13.57k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
5.61k (x2.09)
TOTAL
92.71k
95.84k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i3-4170
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4170
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4