| | | | | | |

Core i3-4170 vs i5-12400F


Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 92.7 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 4.3 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
90675
Core
Haswell
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
7.43k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
18.64k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
13.15k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
14.82k (x3.53)
TOTAL
23.88k
54.04k (x2.26)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
36.23k (x4.7)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
134.76k (x4.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
84.06k (x7.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
16.71k (x6.23)
TOTAL
49k
271.76k (x5.55)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
24.18k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
11.68k
23.85k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.07k
14.42k (x2.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.19k
14.87k (x3.55)
TOTAL
34.04k
77.32k (x2.27)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.81k
122.98k (x4.76)
Test#2 (FP)
25k
168.77k (x6.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
96.11k (x8.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
16.32k (x4.21)
TOTAL
66.65k
404.19k (x6.06)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.24k
24.24k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
12.37k
24.74k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.11k
13.95k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
14.47k (x3.47)
TOTAL
34.89k
77.41k (x2.22)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.15k
126.87k (x4.51)
Test#2 (FP)
29.95k
186.48k (x6.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.84k
92.37k (x7.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.73k
15.45k (x5.65)
TOTAL
72.68k
421.18k (x5.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
33.85k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
20.33k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
10.51k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
11.77k (x2.68)
TOTAL
44.24k
76.46k (x1.73)

Multithread

i3-4170

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
47k
174.21k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
31.06k
141.31k (x4.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.96k
64.86k (x5.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
19.01k (x7.08)
TOTAL
92.71k
399.39k (x4.31)

Performance/W
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
870 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
575 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
222 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
1717 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4170
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5991 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3401 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1375 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1189 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4