Core i3-4160 vs Xeon E5645
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
206c2
Core
Haswell
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
54 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
76.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
1.78k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
3.91k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
2.52k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
2.42k (x0.61)
TOTAL
23.06k
10.64k (x0.46)
Multithread
i3-4160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
9.67k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
22.92k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
14.31k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
3.81k (x0.61)
TOTAL
51.81k
50.7k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i3-4160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
286 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
179 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
634 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
901 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
3798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4