Core i3-4160 vs A6 9210
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 2.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 9210 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 2.7 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
670f00
Core
Haswell
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
July 2014
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
27.13k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4160
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
4.71k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12k
11.03k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
2.59k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
2.45k (x0.58)
TOTAL
34.16k
20.78k (x0.61)
Multithread
i3-4160
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
27.45k
8.43k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
28.96k
12.8k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.83k
3.32k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
2.59k (x0.45)
TOTAL
74k
27.13k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i3-4160
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
508 points/W
562 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
853 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
221 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
1370 points/W
1809 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3616 points/GHz
1683 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3334 points/GHz
3938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1363 points/GHz
927 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1175 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
TOTAL
9488 points/GHz
7420 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4