Core i3-4160 vs i5-11400T
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0671
Core
Haswell
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
3.51k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
14.2k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
7.63k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
6.06k (x1.53)
TOTAL
23.06k
31.39k (x1.36)
Multithread
i3-4160
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
7.4k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
31.37k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
18.11k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
10.23k (x1.63)
TOTAL
51.81k
67.1k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i3-4160
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4