Core i3-4150 vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 5.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
50657
Core
Haswell
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
54 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
16.86k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
12.08k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
3.37k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
6.29k (x1.81)
TOTAL
40.27k
38.61k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-4150
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
150.99k (x5.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
118.54k (x6.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
33.44k (x4.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
8.6k (x3.56)
TOTAL
55k
311.57k (x5.66)
Performance/W
i3-4150
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4