Core i3-4150 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 21.1 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 21.1 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/28
TDP
54 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
35840 kB
Date
May 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
17.8k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
16.51k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
4.47k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.56k (x0.74)
TOTAL
40.27k
41.35k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-4150
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
494.82k (x18.82)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
514.13k (x26.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
132.87k (x18.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
20.8k (x8.6)
TOTAL
55k
1162.63k (x21.14)
Performance/W
i3-4150
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4