Core i3-4150 vs i7-7820HQ
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 3.6 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 3.6 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
23.23k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
20.13k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
4.57k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
7.92k (x2.28)
TOTAL
40.27k
55.85k (x1.39)
Multithread
i3-4150
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
85.54k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
87.07k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
20.37k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
3.57k (x1.48)
TOTAL
55k
196.55k (x3.57)
Performance/W
i3-4150
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4