| | | | | | |

Core i3-4150 vs i5-7400


Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 3.2 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
173.7k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
22.37k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
19.46k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
4.44k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
6.41k (x1.84)
TOTAL
40.27k
52.69k (x1.31)

Multithread

i3-4150

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
79.57k (x3.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
71.41k (x3.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
16.44k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
6.27k (x2.59)
TOTAL
55k
173.7k (x3.16)

Performance/W
i3-4150
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4150
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4