Core i3-4150 vs i3-6006U
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the i3-6006U gets 67.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the i3-6006U gets 67.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
406e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2014
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
67.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
12.6k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
11.66k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
2.71k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
3.68k (x1.06)
TOTAL
40.27k
30.66k (x0.76)
Multithread
i3-4150
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
29.56k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
27.74k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
6.56k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
4.06k (x1.68)
TOTAL
55k
67.91k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i3-4150
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
1971 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
270 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
4528 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
6302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
1842 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
15330 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4