| | | | | | |

Core i3-4150 vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 5950X gets 1060.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 19.3 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
a20f12
Core
Haswell
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
16/32
TDP
54 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2014
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
79.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
1060.62k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
19.88k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
25.26k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
10.77k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
23.59k (x6.78)
TOTAL
40.27k
79.51k (x1.97)

Multithread

i3-4150

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
349.53k (x13.3)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
470.67k (x24.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
207.28k (x29.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
33.13k (x13.7)
TOTAL
55k
1060.62k (x19.28)

Performance/W
i3-4150
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
3329 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
4483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
316 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
10101 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4150
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
4058 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5155 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
2198 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
4815 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
16226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4