Core i3-4150 vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 7.8 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 7.8 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a50f00
Core
Haswell
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2014
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
20.37k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
22.52k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
10.18k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
21.49k (x6.18)
TOTAL
40.27k
74.56k (x1.85)
Multithread
i3-4150
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
144.01k (x5.48)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
191.86k (x9.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
84.53k (x12.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
6.5k (x2.69)
TOTAL
55k
426.9k (x7.76)
Performance/W
i3-4150
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4