Core i3-4150 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3000G is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
13.02k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
20.56k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
4.81k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
5.43k (x1.56)
TOTAL
40.27k
43.82k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-4150
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
27.29k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
49.37k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
13.57k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
5.61k (x2.32)
TOTAL
55k
95.84k (x1.74)
Performance/W
i3-4150
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4