Core i3-4150 vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The i3-4150 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4150 is 1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4150 gets a score of 55 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4150 is 1 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
820f01
Core
Haswell
Dali
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
54 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2014
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.27k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
55k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4150
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
20.5k
9.28k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
11.78k
14.56k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.52k
3.44k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.06k (x0.59)
TOTAL
40.27k
29.34k (x0.73)
Multithread
i3-4150
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
15.75k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.27k
28.63k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.03k
5.87k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
2.17k (x0.9)
TOTAL
55k
52.42k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i3-4150
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
487 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
357 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
130 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
45 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
1019 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4150
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
5856 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3365 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1291 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
11505 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4