Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3240 gets a score of 49.7 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3240 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3240 gets a score of 49.7 k points while the 2200U gets 68.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3240 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Ivy Bridge
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
24.48k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.7k points
71.02k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3240
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.46k
11.54k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
19.69k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
4.55k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
3.25k (x1.46)
TOTAL
24.48k
39.03k (x1.59)
Multithread
i3-3240
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.92k
19.25k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
36.27k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.77k
10.2k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.07k (x1.1)
TOTAL
49.7k
68.8k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i3-3240
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
1283 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
386 points/W
2418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
680 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
205 points/W
TOTAL
904 points/W
4586 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3240
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2490 points/GHz
3394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3145 points/GHz
5792 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
910 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
655 points/GHz
956 points/GHz
TOTAL
7200 points/GHz
11480 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4