Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
Both models i3-3220 and E5-2697 v2 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.3 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.3 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306e4
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
55 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
633.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
10.53k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
9.98k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.4k (x0.91)
TOTAL
25.06k
27.92k (x1.11)
Multithread
i3-3220
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
247.05k (x12.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
264.43k (x10.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
111.01k (x12.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
10.66k (x3.38)
TOTAL
55.82k
633.14k (x11.34)
Performance/W
i3-3220
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4