Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 277.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 277.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
55 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
343.64k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
13.1k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
11.91k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.83k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
25.06k
33.68k (x1.34)
Multithread
i3-3220
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
105.42k (x5.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
109.99k (x4.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
44.56k (x5.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
17.7k (x5.61)
TOTAL
55.82k
277.66k (x4.97)
Performance/W
i3-3220
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
781 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
330 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
2057 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
3309 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1342 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
9354 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4