Core i3-3220 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.6 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.6 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
55 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2012
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
237.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
6.04k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
10.18k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
2.74k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
2.41k (x0.64)
TOTAL
25.06k
21.37k (x0.85)
Multithread
i3-3220
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
47.51k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
75.12k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
19.72k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
5.45k (x1.73)
TOTAL
55.82k
147.8k (x2.65)
Performance/W
i3-3220
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4