Core i3-3220 vs i5-7300U
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
109.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
9.85k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
17.37k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
3.98k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5.11k (x1.37)
TOTAL
25.06k
36.31k (x1.45)
Multithread
i3-3220
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
25.37k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
43.43k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.62k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
5.4k (x1.71)
TOTAL
55.82k
84.82k (x1.52)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
5655 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4