Core i3-3220 vs i5-2540M
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2540M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2540M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2540M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1023, rPGA 988B
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
21.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
48.62k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
7.8k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
7.03k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
3.36k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
2.93k (x0.78)
TOTAL
25.06k
21.12k (x0.84)
Multithread
i3-3220
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
18.55k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
17.42k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
8.43k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
4.22k (x1.34)
TOTAL
55.82k
48.62k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
530 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
498 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
1389 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
2364 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
2132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
6400 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4