| | | | | | |

Core i3-3217U vs Xeon E5645


Description
The i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 32.8 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the E5645 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206c2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6 /6
TDP
17 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
76.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-3217U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
1.79k
1.78k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.02k
3.91k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
2.52k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.31k
2.42k (x1.05)
TOTAL
11.32k
10.64k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-3217U

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
9.67k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
11.47k
22.92k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
14.31k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
3.81k (x1.5)
TOTAL
22.91k
50.7k (x2.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3217U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
5.37k
6.47k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
4.4k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.2k
2.43k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.33k (x1.04)
TOTAL
15.08k
15.64k (x1.04)

Multithread

i3-3217U

E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
12.46k
34.43k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
24.23k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
14.48k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
3.81k (x1.45)
TOTAL
32.75k
76.96k (x2.35)

Performance/W
i3-3217U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
733 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
714 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
325 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
155 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3217U
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
2986 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2919 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1224 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
8378 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4