Core i3-3217U vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 32.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.8 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 32.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.8 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906c0
Core
Ivy Bridge
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3217U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
5.37k
10.08k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
10.11k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.2k
4.06k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.36k (x1.05)
TOTAL
15.08k
26.6k (x1.76)
Multithread
i3-3217U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
12.46k
36.86k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
38.51k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
15.17k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
2.72k (x1.03)
TOTAL
32.75k
93.26k (x2.85)
Performance/W
i3-3217U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
733 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
714 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
325 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
155 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
1926 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3217U
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2986 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2919 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1224 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1250 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
8378 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4