Core i3-3120M vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-3120M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3120M gets a score of 47.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.9 times faster than the i3-3120M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3120M gets a score of 47.8 k points while the 2400G gets 188.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.9 times faster than the i3-3120M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f10
Core
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.12k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.78k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3120M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
7.92k
13.04k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
7.96k
22.35k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
5.37k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
3.4k (x1.08)
TOTAL
22.12k
44.15k (x2)
Multithread
i3-3120M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.82k
56.49k (x3.36)
Test#2 (FP)
19k
100.74k (x5.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.7k
28.21k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.04k (x0.72)
TOTAL
47.78k
188.49k (x3.95)
Performance/W
i3-3120M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
481 points/W
869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
543 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
220 points/W
434 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1365 points/W
2900 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3120M
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3169 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3182 points/GHz
5731 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1236 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
871 points/GHz
TOTAL
8847 points/GHz
11321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4