Core i3-3110M vs Xeon E3-1225
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E3-1225 gets 69 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1225 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
23.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
68.97k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
9.65k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
7.76k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
3.95k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.57k (x0.99)
TOTAL
18.83k
23.94k (x1.27)
Multithread
i3-3110M
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
30.52k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
24.1k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
12.01k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.34k (x1.04)
TOTAL
37.78k
68.97k (x1.83)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
126 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E3-1225
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
2283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
757 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
7041 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4