Core i3-3110M vs m7-6Y75
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
10.24k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
15.33k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.97k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
5.32k (x2.55)
TOTAL
17.03k
33.86k (x1.99)
Multithread
i3-3110M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
16.78k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
25.09k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
6.14k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
5.58k (x2.29)
TOTAL
33.81k
53.58k (x1.58)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4