Core i3-3110M vs i5-2540M
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2540M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2540M is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i5-2540M gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2540M is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
BGA 1023, rPGA 988B
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
21.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
48.62k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
7.8k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
7.03k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.36k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
2.93k (x1.41)
TOTAL
17.03k
21.12k (x1.24)
Multithread
i3-3110M
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
18.55k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
17.42k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
8.43k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
4.22k (x1.74)
TOTAL
33.81k
48.62k (x1.44)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
530 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
498 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
241 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1389 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
i5-2540M
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
2364 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
2132 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
6400 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4