| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs i5-10400T


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
307.18k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
12.61k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
17.94k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
4.83k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
10.81k (x4.15)
TOTAL
18.83k
46.19k (x2.45)

Multithread

i3-3110M

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
74.62k (x4.51)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
119.63k (x10.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
32.65k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.52k (x1.12)
TOTAL
37.78k
229.42k (x6.07)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
12.5k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
19.05k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
4.72k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
10.3k (x4.94)
TOTAL
17.03k
46.57k (x2.73)

Multithread

i3-3110M

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
74.58k (x5.96)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
126.96k (x9.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
31.76k (x6.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.5k (x1.03)
TOTAL
33.81k
235.8k (x6.97)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
6737 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4