Core i3-3110M vs E2 Series 3800
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3800 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
700f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
FT3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
6.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
22.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
2.24k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
2.13k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
1.23k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
0.92k (x0.44)
TOTAL
17.03k
6.52k (x0.38)
Multithread
i3-3110M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
8.61k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
8.13k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
4.61k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.17k (x0.48)
TOTAL
33.81k
22.52k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
574 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
542 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1501 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
1725 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
943 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
708 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4