Core i3-3110M vs A4 6300B
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
610f31
Core
Ivy Bridge
Richland
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
8.35k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
7.31k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.95k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
1.51k (x0.72)
TOTAL
17.03k
20.11k (x1.18)
Multithread
i3-3110M
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
10.88k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
10.01k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.02k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.63k (x0.67)
TOTAL
33.81k
27.54k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4