| | | | | | |

Core i3-2330M vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2330M gets a score of 33.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 164.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 5 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
706e5
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2011
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.02k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.28k points
171.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2330M
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
5.61k
13.58k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
5.42k
19.53k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.45k
9.37k (x3.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
9.23k (x3.65)
TOTAL
16.02k
51.7k (x3.23)

Multithread

i3-2330M

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
11.99k
56.25k (x4.69)
Test#2 (FP)
11.42k
73.73k (x6.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
29.56k (x5.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
5.39k (x1.33)
TOTAL
33.28k
164.94k (x4.96)

Performance/W
i3-2330M
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
343 points/W
3750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
326 points/W
4916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
1971 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
10996 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-2330M
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2551 points/GHz
3772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2465 points/GHz
5424 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
2603 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
TOTAL
7281 points/GHz
14362 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4