| | | | | | |

Core i3-2330M vs FX 6100


Description
The i3-2330M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-2330M gets a score of 33.3 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 6100 is 2 times faster than the i3-2330M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
600f12
Core
Sandy Bridge
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2011
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
16.02k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.28k points
65.32k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-2330M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.61k
7.15k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
5.42k
6.53k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.45k
2.55k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
4.2k (x1.66)
TOTAL
16.02k
20.42k (x1.27)

Multithread

i3-2330M

6100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.99k
24.5k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.42k
23.85k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
13.45k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.07k
3.51k (x0.86)
TOTAL
33.28k
65.32k (x1.96)

Performance/W
i3-2330M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
343 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
326 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
688 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-2330M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2551 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2465 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1115 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1150 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
7281 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4